Het belangrijkste dat je moet weten over jouw Mensenrechten is dat zij het hoogste niveau van wet zijn voor alle landen ter wereld en dat zij je nooit kunnen worden ontnomen, ongeacht wat een autoriteit zegt, of het nu je president, koning of koningin is of, wat dat betreft, welke willekeurige dictator dan ook, want iedereen die tegen deze rechten ingaat ís in feite een dictator.
Er zijn 30 Mensenrechten.
Nummer 30 zegt: “Niemand kan je je Mensenrechten ontnemen”
1. We worden allemaal vrij en gelijkwaardig geboren
2. Discrimineer niet
3. Het recht op leven
4. Geen slavernij
5. Geen marteling
6. Je hebt rechten, waar je ook gaat
7. Voor de wet zijn we allen gelijk
8. Je mensenrechten zijn beschermd door de wet
9. Geen onrechtvaardige gevangenschap
10. Het recht op een proces
11. We zijn onschuldig tenzij schuldig bewezen
12. Het recht op privacy
13. Vrijheid om te gaan en staan waar je wilt
14. Het recht op een veilige woonplek
15. Het recht op een nationaliteit
16. Huwelijk en gezin
17. Het recht op eigendom
18. Vrijheid van denken
19. Vrijheid om jezelf te uiten
20. Het recht om publiekelijk samen te komen
21. Het recht op democratie
22. Sociale zekerheid
23. De rechten van de werknemer
24. Het recht om te spelen
25. Voedsel en onderdak voor iedereen
26. Het recht op onderwijs
27. Auteursrecht
28. Een eerlijke en vrije wereld
29. Verantwoordelijkheid
30. Niemand kan jouw mensenrechten van je afnemen
Meer vereenvoudigde informatie en videos op Jongeren voor Mensenrechten
Officiële Universele Verklaring van de Rechten van de Mens van de Verenigde Naties (EN)
Universele verklaring van de Rechten van de Mens in het Nederlands
Neurenberg Code 1947
(nog even in Generic, sorry)
And then of course there is also the Neurenberg Code from 1947 (PDF popup) stating 10 points.
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
This means that the person concerned must have the legal capacity to consent; must be in a position to exercise full freedom of choice, unimpeded by force, fraud, deceit, intimidation, promise or any other form of coercion or threat; and must have sufficient information and knowledge of the elements of the relevant experiment so that he or she can understand what he or she is deciding. This last element requires that, before accepting an affirmative response from an experimental subject, the researcher must have made known to him or her the nature, duration and purpose of the experiment; the methods and means by which it will be conducted; the inconveniences and risks that can reasonably be expected; and the effects on his or her health or personality that might result from participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility to assess the quality of consent rests with each and every individual who initiates, conducts, or collaborates in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility that cannot be delegated to another with impunity.
2. The experiment should be such as to promise results beneficial to the welfare of society, and which cannot be obtained by other means of study. They may not be of a capricious or unnecessary nature.
3. The experiment should be designed and based on data from previous animal experimentation and on knowledge of the natural history of the disease and other problems under study that may promise results that justify the conduct of the experiment.
4. The experiment shall be conducted in such a way as to avoid unnecessary physical or mental suffering or injury.
5. Experiments which there is a priori reason to believe are likely to result in death or serious incapacitating harm shall not be carried out, except, perhaps, in experiments in which the experimenters themselves serve as subjects.
6. The Degree risk taken may never exceed that determined by the humanitarian significance of the problem the experiment is intended to solve.
7. Appropriate measures shall be taken and suitable arrangements provided to protect the subject from even the remotest possibility of injury, disability or death.
8. Experiments should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest level of competence and care should be required of those conducting or participating in the experiment throughout all phases of the experiment. Degree .
9. During the course of the experiment the subject shall be free to terminate the experiment if he considers that he has reached a physical or mental state in which it seems impossible to continue the experiment.
10. During the course of the experiment, the responsible scientist should be prepared to terminate the experiment at any time if he or she has reason to believe, in the exercise of good faith, proven skill and clinical judgement, that continuation of the experiment is likely to result in the injury, disability or death of the experimental subject result .
Oviedo Convention 1997
Then there is the Oviedo convention of 1997 (PDF popup) “for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on
Human Rights and Biomedicine” (ETS No. 164) – NL versie
Europees verslag over de ethische, juridische, economische en maatschappelijke implicaties van de
menselijke genetica 2001
Ceterum censeo Assangem liberandum esse. #FreeAssange
