You may also like
Page 1 of 13
The most important thing you need to know about your Human Rights is that they are the highest level of law for all the countries in the world and that they cannot ever be taken away from you, independently of what any authority says be it your president, your king or queen or for that matter, any other dictator, because anyone who goes against them is, in fact, a dictator.
There are 30 Human Rights.
No 30 says: “No one can take away your Human Rights”
More simplified information and videos at Youth for Human Rights
Official Universal Declaration of Human Rights by the United Nations (EN)
And then of course there is also the Neurenberg Code from 1947 (PDF popup) regarding medical experiments on humans, which states 10 points.
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
This means that the person concerned must have the legal capacity to consent; must be in a position to exercise full freedom of choice, unimpeded by force, fraud, deceit, intimidation, promise or any other form of coercion or threat; and must have sufficient information and knowledge of the elements of the relevant experiment so that he or she can understand what he or she is deciding. This last element requires that, before accepting an affirmative response from an experimental subject, the researcher must have made known to him or her the nature, duration and purpose of the experiment; the methods and means by which it will be conducted; the inconveniences and risks that can reasonably be expected; and the effects on his or her health or personality that might result from participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility to assess the quality of consent rests with each and every individual who initiates, conducts, or collaborates in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility that cannot be delegated to another with impunity.
In other words, no medical intervention can ever be done without your consent!
2. The experiment should be such as to promise results beneficial to the welfare of society, and which cannot be obtained by other means of study. They may not be of a capricious or unnecessary nature.
3. The experiment should be designed and based on data from previous animal experimentation and on knowledge of the natural history of the disease and other problems under study that may promise results that justify the conduct of the experiment.
4. The experiment shall be conducted in such a way as to avoid unnecessary physical or mental suffering or injury.
5. Experiments which there is a priori reason to believe are likely to result in death or serious incapacitating harm shall not be carried out, except, perhaps, in experiments in which the experimenters themselves serve as subjects.
6. The Degree risk taken may never exceed that determined by the humanitarian significance of the problem the experiment is intended to solve.
7. Appropriate measures shall be taken and suitable arrangements provided to protect the subject from even the remotest possibility of injury, disability or death.
8. Experiments should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest level of competence and care should be required of those conducting or participating in the experiment throughout all phases of the experiment. Degree .
9. During the course of the experiment the subject shall be free to terminate the experiment if he considers that he has reached a physical or mental state in which it seems impossible to continue the experiment.
10. During the course of the experiment, the responsible scientist should be prepared to terminate the experiment at any time if he or she has reason to believe, in the exercise of good faith, proven skill and clinical judgement, that continuation of the experiment is likely to result in the injury, disability or death of the experimental subject result .
“for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine” (ETS No. 164)
What goes against all of this are the recent adaptions to the WHO and IHR indications and amandments. But they are of a lesser order than all the formerly mentioned agreements so legally they do not count. Anyone who wants to impose WHO/IHR rules simply has not understood this or is a dictator or both.





| Cookie name | Active |
|---|---|






