The People's Declaration to actively NOT CONSENT to upcoming UN declaration (international initiative by James Roguski)

The People’s Declaration to actively NOT CONSENT to upcoming UN declaration (international initiative by James Roguski)

Post author:2030 Truth!
Post published:05/09/2023
Reading time:5 mins read
Post category:1 - Resistance against Agenda2030 / 1.02) Secrecy, Censorship, MSM / 1.03) Distraction, Manipulation, MSM / 1.04) Viruses, Pandemics, Vaccines / 1.10) OWO / 2.01) Rejection / 2.03) Petitions, Citizens' Initiative / Europa

This recent “People’s Declaration” initiative (04/09/2023) by James Roguski is quite clear and easy:
RIGHT NOW would be a very good time to stand up and publicly declare your opposition to the international plan to share the “benefits” derived from “pathogens with pandemic potential.”

Because:
The United Nations General Assembly is scheduled to adopt a Political Declaration of the United Nations General Assembly High-level Meeting on Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response on September 20, 2023.

Our silence on this issue means our consent!

Like James, we encourage you to actively express that you actively DO NOT CONSENT (express your own declaration) and to raise awareness of this issue spreading the word far and wide, especially in Europa ♥!

I am opposed to the centralization of power into the hands of unelected, unaccountable and largely unknown bureaucrats through the negotiation of international agreements that absolutely do not reflect the wishes of the people of the world.

I am opposed to what is essentially biological weapons research, regardless of whether it is referred to as vaccine research, gain-of-function research, dual use research of concern, or by any other name. This type of research must not be expanded. It must be stopped.

I am opposed to the use of terrorism and fear-mongering, including in the form of propaganda and censorship, and I am opposed to the weaponization of injectable substances that are masquerading as “vaccines” and are being pushed upon men, women and children around the world without their informed consent.

I reject the “Political Declaration of the United Nations General Assembly High-level Meeting on Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response” because I do not consent to spending up to $30 billion dollars per year to “promote the fair, equitable and timely sharing of benefits arising from the use of pathogens with pandemic potential.”

I also reject the WHO CA+ Framework Convention, commonly known as the “Pandemic Treaty” for a multitude of reasons, including its call for a Pathogen Access and Benefits Sharing System that “aims to ensure timely access to pathogens with pandemic potential and the corresponding benefit-sharing.”

I also reject the proposed Amendments to the International Health Regulations for a multitude of reasons, including the amendments to Annex 1 (submitted by India) that call for the “timely exchange of biological materials and genetic sequence data to WHO” in return for unspecified “benefits.”

The needs of the people of the world have been ignored for far too long. Planning to spend tens of billions of dollars to increase the profits of the Pharmaceutical Hospital Emergency Industrial Complex under the guise of “equity” is simply not acceptable.

I do not consent. #ExitTheWHO

James explaines in the video below. More info at http://thepeoplesdeclaration.com/

The People’s Declaration is NOT a petition.
The People’s Declaration is NOT something you “sign.”
This is NOT trying to collect signatures and data from people who believe that all they need to do to change the world is click a button.
I encourage each and every man, woman and child to make YOUR own declaration.
Record YOUR own video in which you speak YOUR mind and then spread YOUR declaration far and wide.

Here is a poster you can print out and share in real life!

The simple and undeniable fact that the three documents listed below do NOT ban gain-of-function research is more than enough reason to oppose them.
The possibility that these agreements could actually facilitate, fund and support gain-of-function research is absolutely unacceptable. (click on the links below to download the documents)